Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IMPORTANT BOOK TO READ!! --> Memories Of Hempher, The British Spy To The Middle East

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    IMPORTANT BOOK TO READ!! --> Memories Of Hempher, The British Spy To The Middle East

    THESE ARE FACTS THAT EVERY MUSLIM MUST KNOW.


    -----------------------------------
    PREFACE

    Memories Of Hempher, The British Spy To The Middle East is the title of a document that was published in series (episodes) in the German paper Spiegel and later on in a prominent French paper. A Lebanese doctor translated the document to the Arabic language and from there on it was translated to English and other languages. Waqf Ikhlas publications put out and circulated the document in English in hard copy and electronically under the title: Confessions of a British spy and British enmity against Islam. This document reveals the true background of the Wahhabi movement which was innovated by Mohammad bin abdul Wahhab and explains the numerous falsehood they spread in the name of Islam and exposes their role of enmity towards the religion of Islam and towards prophet Mohammad sallallahu ^alayhi wa sallam and towards Muslims at large. No wonder the Wahhabis today stand as the backbone of terrorism allowing and financing and planning shedding the blood of Muslims and other innocent people. Their well known history of terrorism as documented in Fitnatul Wahhabiyyah by the mufti of Makkah, Sheikh Ahmad Zayni Dahlan, and their current assassinations and contravention is due to their ill belief that all are blasphemers save themselves. May Allah protect our nation from their evils.

    Memoirs Of Hempher, The British Spy To The Middle East
    -------------------------------
    FROM: http://www.aicp.org/IslamicInformati...fMrHempher.htm
    Ahmad G
    Islamic Studies Teacher/Student.

    #2
    Hempher says:

    Our Great Britain is very vast. The sun rises over its seas, and sets, again, below its seas. Our State is relatively weak yet in its colonies in India, China and Middle East. These countries are not entirely under our domination. However, we have been carrying on a very active and successful policy in these places. We shall be in full possession of all of them very soon. Two things are of importance:

    1- To try to retain the places we have already obtained;

    2- To try to take possession of those places we have not obtained yet.

    The Ministry of Colonies assigned a commission from each of the colonies for the execution of these two tasks. As soon as I entered the Ministry of Colonies, the Minister put his trust in me and appointed me the administrator of the company of East India. Outwardly it was a company of trade. But its real task was to search for ways of taking control of the very vast lands of India.

    Our government was not at all nervous about India. India was a country where people from various nationalities, speaking different languages, and having contrasting interests lived together. Nor were we afraid of China. For the religions dominant in China were Buddhism and Confucianism, neither of which was much of a threat. Both of them were dead religions that instituted no concern for life and which were no more than forms of addresses. For this reason, the people living in these two countries were hardly likely to have any feelings of patriotism. These two countries did not worry us, the British government. Yet the events that might occur later were not out of consideration for us. Therefore, we were designing long term plans to wage discord, ignorance, poverty, and even diseases in these countries. We were imitating the customs and traditions of these two countries, thus easily concealing our intentions.

    What frazzled our nerves most was the Islamic countries. We had already made some agreements, all of which were to our advantage, with the Sick Man (the Ottoman Empire). Experienced members of the Ministry of Colonies predicted that this sick man would pass away in less than a century. In addition, we had made some secret agreements with the Iranian government and placed in these two countries statesmen whom we had made masons. Such corruptions as bribery, incompetent administration and inadequate religious education, which in its turn led to busying with pretty women and consequently to neglect of duty, broke the backbones of these two countries. In spite of all these, we were anxious that our activities should not yield the results we expected, for reasons I am going to cite below:

    1- Muslims are extremely devoted to Islam. Every individual Muslims is as strongly attached to Islam as a priest or monk to Christianity, if not more. As it is known, priests and monks would rather die than give up Christianity. The most dangerous of such people are the Shiites in Iran. For they put down people who are not Shiites as disbelievers and foul people. Christians are like noxious dirt according to Shiites. Naturally, one would do one's best to get rid of dirt. I once asked a Shiite this: Why do you look on Christians as such? The answer I was given was this: "The Prophet of Islam was a very wise person. He put Christians under a spiritual oppression in order to make them find the right way by joining Allah's religion, Islam. As a matter of fact, it is a State policy to keep a person found dangerous under a spiritual oppression until he pledges obedience. The dirt I am speaking about is not material; it is a spiritual oppression which is not peculiar to Christians alone. It involves Sunnites and all disbelievers. Even our ancient Magian Iranian ancestors are foul according to Shiites."

    I said to him: "Well! Sunnites and Christians believe in Allah, in Prophets, and in the Judgment Day, too; why should they be foul, then?" He replied, "They are foul for two reasons: They impute mendacity to our Prophet, Hadrat Muhammad may Allah protect us against such an act! (1)* And we, in response to this atrocious imputation, follow the rule expressed in the saying, If a person torments you, you can torment him in return', and say to them: 'You are foul.' Second; Christians make offensive allegations about the Prophets of Allah. For instance, they say: Isaa (Jesus) 'alaihis-salaam' would take (hard) drinks. Because he was accursed, he was crucified."

    In consternation, I said to the man that Christians did not say so. "Yes, they do," was the answer, "and you don't know. It is written so in the Holy Bible." I became quite. For the man was right in the first respect, if not in the second respect. I did not want to continue the dispute any longer. Otherwise they might be suspicious of me in an Islamic attire as I was. I therefore avoided such disputes.

    2- Islam was once a religion of administration and authority. And Muslims were respected. It would be difficult to tell these respectable people that they are slaves now. Nor would it be possible to falsify the Islamic history and say to Muslims: The honor and respect you obtained at one time was the result of some (favorable) conditions. Those days are gone now, and they will never come back.

    3- We were very anxious that the Ottomans and Iranians might notice our plots and foil them. Despite the fact that these two States had already been debilitated considerably, we still did not feel certain because they had a central government with property, weaponry, and authority.

    4- We were extremely uneasy about the Islamic scholars. For the scholars of Istanbul and Al-adh-har, the Iraqi and Damascene scholars were insurmountable obstacles in front of our purposes. For they were the kind of people who would never compromise their principles to the tiniest extent because they had turned against the transient pleasures and adornments of the world and fixed their eyes on the Paradise promised by Qur'aan al-kereem. The people followed them. Even the Sultan was afraid of them. Sunnites were not so strongly adherent to scholars as were Shiites. For Shiites did not read books; they only recognized scholars, and did not show due respect to the Sultan. Sunnites, on the other hand, read books, and respected scholars and the Sultan.

    We therefore prepared a series of conferences. Yet each time we tried we saw with disappointment that the road was closed for us. The reports we received from our spies were always frustrating, and the conferences came to naught. We did not give up hope, though. For we are the sort of people who have developed the habit of taking a deep breath and being patient.

    The Minister himself, the highest priestly orders, and a few specialists attended one of our conferences. There were twenty of us. Our conference lasted three hours, and the final session was closed without reaching a fruitful conclusion. Yet a priest said, "Do not worry! For the Messiah and his companions obtained authority only after a persecution that lasted three hundred years. It is hoped that, from the world of the unknown, he will cast an eye on us and grant us the good luck of evicting the unbelievers, (he means Muslims), from their centers, be it three hundred years later. With a strong belief and long-term patience, we must arm ourselves! In order to obtain authority, we must take possession of all sorts of media, try all possible methods. We must try to spread Christianity among Muslims. It will be good for us to realize our goal, even if it will be after centuries. For fathers work for their children."

    A conference was held, and diplomats and religious men from Russia and France as well as from England attended. I was very lucky. I, too, attended because I and the Minister were in very good terms. In the conference, plans of breaking Muslims into groups and making them abandon their faith and bringing them round to belief (Christianizing them) like in Spain was discussed. Yet the conclusions reached were not as had been expected. I have written all the talks held in that conference in my book "Ilaa Melekoot-il-Meseeh."

    It is difficult to suddenly uproot a tree that has sent out its roots to the depths of the earth. But we must make hardships easy and overcome them. Christianity came to spread. Our Lord the Messiah promised us this. The bad conditions that the east and the west were in, helped Muhammad. Those conditions being gone, have taken away the nuisances (he means Islam) that accompanied them. We observe with pleasure today that the situation has changed completely. As a result of great works and endeavors of our ministry and other Christian governments Muslims are on the decline now. Christians, on the other hand, are gaining ascendancy. It is time we retook the places we lost throughout centuries. The powerful State of Great Britain pioneers this blessed task [of annihilating Islam].


    CONTINUE !<A HREF="http://www.aicp.org/IslamicInformation/MemoirsOfMrHempher.htm" TARGET=_blank>[/URL]

    ------------------
    <<>> Learning the Obligatory Knowledge of the Religion puts the Muslim on the road for excellence and self-betterment. Acquire The Islamic Knowledge Before You Discuss Religion!!

    Ahmad/Islamic Studies

    Brothers and Sisters: You are Invited to attend Live Islamic Lessons Daily
    (Paltalk - Voice and Text Chat Rooms)

    [URL=http://www.anwarul-islam.com/html/instructions.html]-The Light of Islam - Click for Live English Islamic Lessons</A>
    --The Call of Knowledge - Click for Live Arabic Islamic Classes 24/7

    Discussion Forum: [URL=http://www.talkaboutislam.com/]</A>

    [This message has been edited by Ahmad G (edited February 09, 2002).]
    Ahmad G
    Islamic Studies Teacher/Student.

    Comment


      #3
      read the book in arabic: http://www.salafiya.com

      [This message has been edited by Ahmad G (edited March 15, 2002).]

      [This message has been edited by Ahmad G (edited March 15, 2002).]
      Ahmad G
      Islamic Studies Teacher/Student.

      Comment


        #4
        Thanks for sharing. It's very informative and tells us how others percieve us.

        "Islam was once a religion of administration and authority. And Muslims were respected. It would be difficult to tell these respectable people that they are slaves now. Nor would it be possible to falsify the Islamic history and say to Muslims: The honor and respect you obtained at one time was the result of some (favorable) conditions. Those days are gone now, and they will never come back."

        whites have a superiority complex, they always dehumanize and mistretae people by telling them that they are inferioe than them (whites). Thats how they made slaverly and colonism successfull. But their days are gone. Time has proven that they have no superiority over non whites. Infact, they are the most racist and evil people.

        Comment


          #5
          As a race, Caucasians have done very bad things to people of other ethnic backrounds, to be sure. Given the opportunity, would not others do the same? All whites were never completely racist. There always were those that sought better relations and respect. Generally these folks were not in positions of power and this fact speaks to the reasons why they acted thusly. It was not an accident that Communists exectuted certain individuals and their relatives. They were enemies of the common citizen in some regards.

          [This message has been edited by TOMASSO (edited March 18, 2002).]

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Ahmad G:
            Memories Of Hempher, The British Spy To The Middle East is the title of a document that was published in series (episodes) in the German paper Spiegel and later on in a prominent French paper.
            The Ahmadi movement started from the British government's desire to create a cleave in the Muslims. They continue to do the same disservice today.

            Do we have to listen to a British spy's 'confession' published in a German newspaper and then by a French newspaper? If you want to read about a Muslim, read from Muslim sources of repute.


            ------------------
            Rabbeshrah lee sadree; wa yassirlee amree; yafqahoo qaulee.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by TOMASSO:
              As a race, Caucasions have done very bad things to people of other ethnic backrounds, to be sure. Given the opportunity, would not others do the same? All whites were never completely racist. There always were those that sought better relations and respect. Generally these folks were not in positions of power and this fact speaks to the reasons why they acted thusly. It was not an accident that Communists exectuted certain individuals and their relatives. They were enemies of the common citizen in some regards.

              I don't mean to say that all whites are racist, most whites to whom I know are very nice and koolll people.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by TOMASSO:
                As a race, Caucasions have done very bad things to people of other ethnic backrounds, to be sure. Given the opportunity, would not others do the same? All whites were never completely racist. There always were those that sought better relations and respect. Generally these folks were not in positions of power and this fact speaks to the reasons why they acted thusly. It was not an accident that Communists exectuted certain individuals and their relatives. They were enemies of the common citizen in some regards.
                My dear well mannered well spoken leftist socialist TOMASSO, first of all dont give us crap about the ol white man burden and how he exploited the world and the masses of the world were esploited by the caucasion race.
                Caucasion race? what do you mean by that. You mean the anthropological caucasoids folks ? But that would include arabs, north africans , indians etc... I guess not. I think by caucasion you mean the europeans. LOL
                Save your pain, eorupeans of different races have been fighting among themslevs since beginning of history, the germenic tribes vandals, gauls, romans....and then germany, italy, britian, poland all fights and stuff. So for most part of human history europeans didnt have much of what you are calling human exploitation of the world. The current dominant race are europeans of northwestern europe and not the mediterranean (who are basically famous acredited for all the great ancient stuff). Forget the balkans and baltic who have for most part of history themsleves be suppressed.
                The European colonial powers because of certain conditions in europe and else where were able to expand. And thats ok, every one was expansionist....the reason if someone may label a particular colonial power brutal and that good stuff is because "during" the expansionism what happened. Mongol khan was expansionsist and so were the arabs? Difference? oh u betcha.
                So basically I want to save your sense of self pity when you feel that caucasion have been bad, cuz first of all what is caucasion? So lets narrow it down to european, and that too europeans of recent centuries -- the colonial era
                And are you like a socialist expansionist saying that all europeans are one race? anthropologically all are caucasion but they for sure arnt one people. So I think it would be more appropraite if visigoth apologized to italians, greeks apologize to myceneans, ostrogoths to slavic, scandinivians to slavic, germany to all of europe, vandals to the original spaniards, hungarians to basically everyone etc etc etc...
                And after tis is done, we can talk of reparitions to europeans by the exploitation of non europeans folks the huns, the mongols the turks, the arabs, the phoenicians etc....
                Then we talk of the bad bad stuff the european man did to the non european ones
                Communists were racists...? well nazis wernt kammis and chinese arnt caucasian...so err?

                And since the current dominant people who hold the string to world politics are mostly from the northwestern european stocks, so basically that is proof that even the most barbarric race is capable of magnanimous progress.
                peace!

                Comment


                  #9
                  Well my point of reference of the proper relationship was post WWII in regards to the West and the receptive rest of the world. Pakistan recieved a good deal of aid etc. over a 40 year period after the war. I think it ranked quite high before we started giving to the Israelis it may have surpassed this. There was a certain suspicion of the Israelis being more in the Communist camp early on. You are correct about history, to say the least. However, the modern era is seen as being a great improvement over that, if only in theory. Some cultures have faired much better than others in a colonial setting. I am writing this from a former colony-America! I am of northern European descent, but now believe that some of my earlier ancestors probably came from the north of central asia! This area was a major civilization in the dim, dark past. So what comes around, really goes around. My remark about Communist liquidations are definately not along ethnic lines, they are along social ones. The Communists were supposed to be race desensitive, but did commit pograms against races also. They did seem to hold things together in the Yugoslavia, after which we all know the story. I am not so much of the political persuasion you describe. I am, what I consider to be a product of America at it's best. Unfortunately, my country changed, I did not! I really like the fact that I can discuss topics with those foreigners who are able to speak English. I think it is also great that you can easily speak to Americans in America. Dialogue is very important. Was the area that is now Pakistan exploited to the degree that "eastern" India was? I have the impression it wasn't, nor Afganistan.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X