Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A Regime That Hates Democracy Can't Wage War for Democracy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    A Regime That Hates Democracy Can't Wage War for Democracy

    Yet another rebuttal of the double standards and hypocrisy of the Bush regime.

    Let's establish (re-establish?) democracy in the good ol USof A and then maybe contemplate what other countries are doing. While we're at it why not lead by example and destroy the WMD held by USA?


    "George W. Bush says he wants to attack Iraq to install democracy. But as he explained on December 18, 2002: "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator."

    Under Bush the Constitutional guarantees that have made America a beacon to the world for two centuries have been shredded in two short years.

    In terms of basic legal rights and sanctuary from government spying, Americans may be less free under George W. Bush than as British subjects under George III in 1776.
    ...
    * President Bush has asserted the right to execute "suspected terrorists" without trial or public notice;
    * The Administration claims the right to torture "suspected terrorists," and by many accounts has already done so;
    * Attorney-General John Ashcroft has asserted the right to brand "a terrorist" anyone he wishes without evidence or public hearing or legal recourse;
    * The Administration has arrested and held without trial hundreds of "suspected terrorists" while denying them access to legal counsel or even public notification that they have been arrested;
    * The Administration has asserted the right to inspect the records of bookstores and public libraries to determine what American citizens are reading;
    * The Administration has asserted the right to break into private homes and tap the phones of US citizens without warrants;
    * The Administration has attempted to install a neighbors-spying-on-neighbors network that would have been the envy of Joe Stalin;
    * The Administration has effectively negated the Freedom of Information Act and runs by all accounts the most secretive regime in US history;
    * When the General Accounting Office, one of the few reliably independent federal agencies, planned to sue Vice President Dick Cheney to reveal who he met to formulate the Bush Energy Bill, Bush threatened to slash GAO funding, and the lawsuit was dropped;
    * After losing the 2000 election by more than 500,000 popular votes (but winning a 5-4 majority of the US Supreme Court), the Administration plans to control all voting through computers operated by just three companies, with code that can be easily manipulated, as may have been done in Georgia in 2002, winning seats for a Republican governor and US senator, and in Nebraska to elect and re-elect US Senator Chuck Hagel, an owner of the voting machine company there;
    * FCC Chair Michael Powell (son of Colin) is enforcing the Administration's demand that regulation be ended so nearly all mass media can be monopolized by a tiny handful of huge corporations;
    * Attorney-General Ashcroft has assaulted states rights, a traditional Republican mainstay, using federal troops to trash public referenda legalizing medical marijuana in nine states;
    * Ashcroft has overridden his own federal prosecutors and assaulted local de facto prohibitions against the death penalty, which has been renounced by every other industrial nation and is now used only by a handful of dictatorships, including Iraq.
    ..."

    Common Dreams has been providing breaking news & views for the progressive community since 1997. We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported. Our Mission: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

    #2
    In terms of basic legal rights and sanctuary from government spying, Americans may be less free under George W. Bush than as British subjects under George III in 1776.

    Yes under the cover of war the Bush regime has passed laws that restrict basic freedoms and that target non-American's.

    Comment


      #3
      Some more on the "democracy" of the current regime in USA. And still we have doubters about the absurdity (not to say anything stonger) of this "pre-emptive" war.

      "Who is in Charge?
      A Tiny, Unelected Group, Supported by Powerful, Unrepresentative Minorities

      by Edward Said

      The Bush administration's relentless unilateral march towards war is profoundly disturbing for many reasons, but so far as American citizens are concerned the whole grotesque show is a tremendous failure in democracy. An immensely wealthy and powerful republic has been hijacked by a small cabal of individuals, all of them unelected and therefore unresponsive to public pressure, and simply turned on its head.
      ...
      Every one of the 500 congressional districts in this country has a defense industry in it, so that war has been turned into a matter of jobs, not of security.
      ...
      Demonstrations are looked at simply as a kind of degraded mob action, while the most hypocritical lies pass for absolute truth, without criticism and without objection.

      The media has simply become a branch of the war effort. What has entirely disappeared from television is anything remotely resembling a consistently dissenting voice.
      ...
      When these organizations mention Iraq's flouting of 17 UN resolutions as a pretext for war, the 64 resolutions flouted by Israel (with US support) are never mentioned.
      ...
      The American people have thus been deliberately lied to, their interests cynically misrepresented and misreported, the real aims and intentions of this private war of Bush the son and his junta concealed with complete arrogance. Never mind that Wolfowitz, Feith, and Perle, all of them unelected officials who work for unelected Donald Rumsfeld at the Pentagon, have for some time openly advocated Israeli annexation of the West Bank and Gaza and the cessation of the Oslo process, have called for war against Iraq (and later Iran), and the building of more illegal Israeli settlements in their capacity (during Netanyahu's successful campaign for prime minister in 1996) as private consultants to him, and that that has become US policy now.
      ...
      Democracy traduced and betrayed, democracy celebrated but in fact humiliated and trampled on by a tiny group of men who have simply taken charge of this republic as if it were nothing more than, what, an Arab country? It is right to ask who is in charge since clearly the people of the United States are not properly represented by the war this administration is about to loose on a world already beleaguered by too much misery and poverty to endure more. And Americans have been badly served by a media controlled essentially by a tiny group of men who edit out anything that might cause the government the slightest concern or worry.
      ..."

      Common Dreams has been providing breaking news & views for the progressive community since 1997. We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported. Our Mission: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

      Comment


        #4
        The US is a Republic, not a Democracy..... from the beginning though it's been more of a Plutocracy.
        JaddoN kaddya jaloos ghareeba tay shehr ich choatalee lug gayee

        Comment

        Working...
        X