Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Farewell to democracy in Pakistan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Farewell to democracy in Pakistan

    An excellent article on American policies

    --

    Robert Fisk: Farewell to democracy in Pakistan
    http://argument.independent.co.uk/co...p?story=101459

    'Far better to have a Mubarak or King Fahd than let Muslims vote for a real government that might oppose US policies'
    26 October 2001
    Armoured warfare schools, signals headquarters, artillery ranges, military museums, cavalry lines, infantry battalion compounds... every few hundred yards in every city, you come across them. Driving around Pakistan is like touring a barracks.

    Cross the Indus river at Attock and the thump of shellfire changes the air pressure as General Pervez Musharraf's tanks move down the range. Along the roadsides are artillery pieces dating back to the Raj, 45-pounders and French armour and old Sherman tanks on concrete plinths to remind Pakistanis of their heroic martial past.

    Their national defence journal carries stirring tales by former chiefs of staff and extracts from the 1962 war diaries of the East Pakistan Rifles. And this is supposed to be a nation threatened with Islamic revolution?

    It's an odd phenomenon, but there are times when the West seems to be more worried about the "Islamisation'' of Pakistan than Pakistanis are themselves. For has a military dictatorship ever been more blessed than that of General Musharraf? General Zia-ul-Haq was held in contempt by the West when he hanged prime minister Bhutto but he was elevated to ally and friend the moment that we needed his help in the anti-Soviet war in Afghanistan. However, by 1993 Pakistan was almost declared a "state sponsor of terrorism'' by the United States because of its support for Kashmiri Muslim guerrillas.

    When President Clinton arrived in the subcontinent last year, he paid a state visit to India but gave General Musharraf who had still to declare himself president only a few hours, favouring Pakistan with a one-day return trip, a lecture on the evils of Osama bin Laden and an appeal to General Musharraf not to hang the prime minister, Nawaz Sharif.

    Nor can General Musharraf have been too pleased with Colin Powell's ode to liberty last January. "There should be no question in any world leader's mind that the most essential ingredient for success in this 21st century is a free people and a government that derives its right to govern from the consent of such people,'' the US Secretary of State announced: "...America stands ready to help any country that wishes to join the democratic world.''

    Then came 11 September and General Powell produced a new song sheet. "President Bush,'' he told us on 16 October, "asked me... to demonstrate our enduring commitment to our relationship with Pakistan... we are also looking forward to strengthening our co-operation on a full range of bilateral and regional issues... we're truly at the beginning of a strengthened relationship, a relationship that will grow and thrive in the months and years ahead.'' All of which just goes to show what the loan of a few air bases and the arrest of a few government-sponsored Islamists can do. General Musharraf had taken "bold and courageous action" against "international terrorism".

    And in the blinking of an eye, there was General Powell promising to take up the Kashmir dispute with India the very nation that almost persuaded America's State Department to put Pakistan on its "terrorism" list in 1992. Newsweek outlined the US government's view with alarming, if unconscious, frankness. "It may be a good thing that Pakistan is ruled by a friendly military dictator,'' the magazine concluded, "rather than what could well be a hostile democracy.''

    This, of course, is the very policy that dictates Washington's relations with the Arab world. Far better to have a Mubarak or a King Abdullah or a King Fahd running the show than to let the Arabs vote for a real government that might oppose US policies in the region.

    Corrupt, lawless, drug-ridden, and inherently unstable Pakistan may be, but General Musharraf allows a kind of freedom of speech to continue. Anyone used to the arid wastes of Arab journalism can only be surprised by the debate in the Pakistani press, the often violent anti-Musharraf views expressed in the letters pages and the columnists who argue forcefully for a return to democracy. If General Musharraf has to allow Islamists their freedom to "let off steam'' as Pakistanis like to say then he has to give equal space to the democrats.

    Aqil Shah put it very well when he wrote in Lahore's Friday Times last week that, by allying himself with America's "War on Terror'', General Musharraf had secured de facto international acceptance for his 1999 coup. Suddenly, all he had wished for the lifting of sanctions, massive funding for Pakistan's crumbling industry, IMF loans, a $375m (263m) debt rescheduling and humanitarian aid has been given him.

    While General Powell mutters a few words about political freedom and none at all about Pakistan's nuclear tests we hear no more of General Musharraf's widely publicised "roadmap'' to democracy.

    The problem, as Mr Shah points out, is that future peace and stability requires sustained investment in solid secular democracies not in stable dictatorships. Yet the United States is now laying the foundations of a long-term autocracy in Pakistan, a dictatorship not unlike those that lie like a cancer across the Middle East.

    The United States likes to call this a "strategic engagement'' and is already, in its embassy's private press briefings, reminding journalists of the corruption that smeared the democratically elected Sharif government. Far better, surely, to have an honest, down-to-earth, clean military man in charge.

    Of course, we must forget that it was Pakistan's Interservices Intelligence (ISI) outfits the highest ranks of the country's security agencies that set up the Taliban, funnelled weapons into Afghanistan and grew rich on the narcotics trade. Ever since the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, the ISI has worked alongside the CIA, funding the mullahs and maulawis now condemned as the architects of "world terror''.

    Most Pakistanis now realise that the ISI sanctioned by Washington rather than Pakistan's own rulers turned into a well-armed and dangerous mafia, and while money was poured into its smuggling activities, Pakistan's people lacked education, security and a health service. No wonder they turned to Islam and the madrassa schools for food and teaching.

    But will anything really change? Pakistan's military is now more important than ever, an iron hand to maintain order within the state while its superpower ally bombs the ruins of Afghanistan. Driving past all those compounds and cavalry lines and barrack squares in Pakistan, one can only be shocked by the profound social division they represent.

    Outside in the street, Afghan refugees and Pakistan's urban poor root through garbage tips and crowd on to soot-pumping buses to work in sweatshops and brick factories. Inside, behind the ancient, newly painted cannons and battalion flags, rose bushes surround well-tended lawns and officers' messes decorated with polished brass fittings.

    No rubbish litters this perfect world of discipline. Why should anyone living here want a return to corrupt democracy? Especially when America is their friend.

    #2



    although i hate the smiley's .. this deserves it.


    democracy advocates think of it as the only way to govern. fools don't realize that democracy is not going to work until we have mass education, stability in the region, and a lot less corruption in the political arena.

    i wouldn't mind mushraff staying in power for another 5 years, as long as he continues to increase the tax base, recover the loans from defaulters, and keeps banning politicans for corruption.

    Comment


      #3
      when did US care? in fact, in current situation,. musharraf losing power is entirely unwelcome to US.

      dictators make trusted henchmen. what is hosni mubarak? he gets 90% votes in refenrendums and everyone knows how. egypt got 7 bn dollors.

      Comment


        #4
        The problem is that whenever a politician is given the opportunity to rule, he or she completely messes it up.Even if you are as liberal as they come,you cannot excuse the politicians of Pakistan.Dictatorship has it's advantages.However,the problem is that a dictator is not the man of the future and every nation must look ahead instead of backwards.Democracy is a must in Pakistan.The timing of that though,is unclear.I think President Musharaff will hold elections next year because if he doesent he will lose the support of Pakistan's upper and middle class powers.The fact is that the majority of upper and middle class Pakistanis are liberals and intellectuals who believe democracy is a must, usually for the wrong reasons.Nevertheless,they are a powerful bunch who are supporting Mushraff and will continue to support him unless he does not hold elections next year.I think everyone accepts that Musharaff will remain as President of Pakistan,and we will see the return of Article 58-2-B in the 8th Amendment to the Constitution of Pakistan.He will retire as COAS and will simply remain the President,to oversee the Prime Minister and his/her government.I do not see anything wrong with that and I think that may turn out to be a good omen for Pakistan as Musharaff has impressed me with his role thus far.

        Finally,regardless of who the US wants in power,the future of Pakistan is in the hands of the Pakistani people.It`s up to us to decide what we want.If politicians do not screw us over,then we will oppose army rule but if they have not learned from the mistakes of the past,then there is no other alternative available.

        Comment


          #5
          ZZ mah man, i love deomcracy, the practice and principle, but dewd u did not want to live in Pakistan when Benazir was in power.

          Her brother, thankfully banished to hell, or to never never land by some unknown gunmen ( some say it was her husband's doing) was just as bad as her.

          His goons actually took over commercial office space which belonged to my family and was empty for renovations. Lets just say we could not get it back for years.

          Given a choice between a democracy of that sort or a military rule, i would prefer military rule. given a choice for real democracy with accountability and real leadership I will always go for democracy. oops forgot I cant even vote in pakistan, but u get the point.
          The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he did not exist. And like that... he is gone.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Fraudz:
            [B]ZZ mah man, i love deomcracy, the practice and principle, but dewd u did not want to live in Pakistan when Benazir was in power.

            Her brother, thankfully banished to hell, or to never never land by some unknown gunmen ( some say it was her husband's doing) was just as bad as her.

            His goons actually took over commercial office space which belonged to my family and was empty for renovations. Lets just say we could not get it back for years.

            B]
            Oye fraudia who says that plot actually belonged to your family anyway?kabza-wasuli zindabad.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Sherlock:
              Oye fraudia who says that plot actually belonged to your family anyway?kabza-wasuli zindabad.


              shush oye, saray pol na khol faqeeraaan day
              The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he did not exist. And like that... he is gone.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by nomaan:



                although i hate the smiley's .. this deserves it.


                democracy advocates think of it as the only way to govern. fools don't realize that democracy is not going to work until we have mass education, stability in the region, and a lot less corruption in the political arena.

                i wouldn't mind mushraff staying in power for another 5 years, as long as he continues to increase the tax base, recover the loans from defaulters, and keeps banning politicans for corruption.
                Yes, corruption should be limited to defence only.
                http://www.dawn.com/2001/10/26/top9.htm


                shame on Paki army, its American friends, and the people who support both.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by FreeMind:
                  shame on Paki army, its American friends, and the people who support both.
                  It quotes the 'defence divion' as the most corrupt. I hope you know the difference between the 'defence division' and the 'Paki Army'.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    The change in USA policy regarding democracy in Pakistan will definitely clear the way of Taliban style government in Pakistan. I think it is good time for Pakistan to make a final decision what type of government it wants. In view of merciless American bombing in Afghanistan and continuos racial profiling by western media will accelerate the TALIBANISATION of Pakistan.

                    FARID

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I don't agree with Mus.... and the way he is letting Pakistan be used to attack another country - but I don't think democracy is so wonderful.

                      In america and britain, the governments do whatever they want too because they know that at election time all they have to do is give tax cuts and they will get the votes.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X