Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

‘India occupies 700 acres of Bangladeshi land’

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    ‘India occupies 700 acres of Bangladeshi land’

    India occupies 700 acres of Bangladeshi land
    Thursday 12-05-2005

    DHAKA: India keeps under her occupation about seven hundred acres of Bangladeshi land in Panchagar, the northernmost district of Bangladesh, BDR sources say. Bangladesh cannot recover from Indian occupation a total of 694.48 acres of land under two upazilas of Panchagar. The proposals that BDR (Bangladesh Rifles) put forwarded for the recovery of this land, are yet to be implemented, sources complained. No step was taken to demarcate the land under the joint survey of concerned authorities of Bangladesh and India.

    The Bangladeshi lands that India illegally keeps under its occupation are situated (157.48 acres) in Argee, Shikarpur, Khudipara, Kazaldighi, Parani villages under Panchagar Sadar Upazila and (537 acres) in Nowtari and Daikahta villages under Boda Upazil of Panchagar district. As a result, tension prevails all along in Panchangar frontier between BDR of Bangladesh and BSF (Border Security Forces). Rounds of meetings between district administrations and BDR and BSF failed to settle the dispute. app


    http://dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp...-5-2005_pg4_22

    I guess Ghauri and Shaheen's intimidation has forced Hindustan to occupy defenceless lands elsewhere... Shameless Hindustan or what?

    #2
    Re: India occupies 700 acres of Bangladeshi land

    really? just read a newspaper from 1971

    Comment


      #3
      Re: India occupies 700 acres of Bangladeshi land

      The world has moved on and Hindustan is still locked in dinosaur age ideology of rule and conquer defenceless lands, pathetic.

      Comment


        #4
        Re: India occupies 700 acres of Bangladeshi land

        oh, what happened? now you call pakistan defenceless? because if India took these acres (I doubt it btw) it was taken from pakistan (because at that time there was no bangla desh)

        Comment


          #5
          Re: India occupies 700 acres of Bangladeshi land

          Originally posted by Green & White
          The world has moved on and Hindustan is still locked in dinosaur age ideology
          That's a very comical statement coming from someone who, on an almost daily basis, calls for a new era of statehood and warfare based on religion.

          Comment


            #6
            Re: India occupies 700 acres of Bangladeshi land

            These hindus man I tell ya Pakistan should just attack India and get over it. you know I am sick of these friggin Indians. Lets just attack and get it over with.
            Can you Hear me Now!! Good

            Comment


              #7
              Re: India occupies 700 acres of Bangladeshi land

              Originally posted by Green & White
              I guess Ghauri and Shaheen's intimidation has forced Hindustan to occupy defenceless lands elsewhere... Shameless Hindustan or what?
              i thought Indian Kashmir was "occupied"? nice to see you finally acknowledging that Kashmir is Indian land.

              btw, i'm pretty sure the Indian "occupiers" of Kashmir are within reach of Ghauri and Shaheen.....are they not?
              Last edited by nikhil25; May 13, 2005, 07:25 PM.

              Comment


                #8
                Re: India occupies 700 acres of Bangladeshi land

                ^ ???

                Comment


                  #9
                  Re: India occupies 700 acres of Bangladeshi land

                  700 acres? Thats like a farm. Barely worth the newsprint.
                  Boycott Venezuelas State owned Citgo.

                  Buy Royal Dutch Shell gasoline!

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Re: India occupies 700 acres of Bangladeshi land

                    ^ But considering Hindustan's ever out of control birth rate, every inch they can grab here and there will do.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Re: India occupies 700 acres of Bangladeshi land

                      Originally posted by Green & White
                      ^ ???
                      you insinuated that big bad Pakistan and its amazing missiles have made the Indian army pack its bags and head for Bangladesh ("forced Hindustan to occupy defenceless lands elsewhere")

                      how does this make any sense? or was it just a failed attempt at humor on your part?

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Re: India occupies 700 acres of Bangladeshi land

                        Are you jealous of Indians' potency G&W? In that case check this out!



                        >>> Speacial link for G&W's reading pleasure <<<

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Re: India occupies 700 acres of Bangladeshi land

                          ^ That's nothing... Last years brightest children in United Kingdom were Pakistanis...

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Re: India occupies 700 acres of Bangladeshi land

                            Originally posted by nikhil25
                            you insinuated that big bad Pakistan and its amazing missiles have made the Indian army pack its bags and head for Bangladesh ("forced Hindustan to occupy defenceless lands elsewhere")

                            how does this make any sense? or was it just a failed attempt at humor on your part?
                            Hindustan has already occupied 45% of Kashmir (and it represses the innnocent Kashmiri people on daily basis) and also occupied the Siachin Glacier. If Pakistan hadn't been sabre-rattling with it's nukes for the last 6 years, Hindustan wouldn't had to halt it's plans in 2002.

                            However, as more and more Pakistani nukes are pointing at New Delhi, Hindustan has all but abandoned any further plans to occupy more Pakistani territory but instead is now looking at other non-nuclear areas.

                            It's a cowardly act by Hindustan to target a defenceless Bangladesh.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Re: India occupies 700 acres of Bangladeshi land

                              Originally posted by Green & White
                              Hindustan has already occupied 45% of Kashmir (and it represses the innnocent Kashmiri people on daily basis) and also occupied the Siachin Glacier. If Pakistan hadn't been sabre-rattling with it's nukes for the last 6 years, Hindustan wouldn't had to halt it's plans in 2002.

                              However, as more and more Pakistani nukes are pointing at New Delhi, Hindustan has all but abandoned any further plans to occupy more Pakistani territory but instead is now looking at other non-nuclear areas.
                              India doesn't want Pakistani Kashmir...it simply claims legal ownership of that land. "Azad Kashmir" is the scraps...India already has all the good parts of Kashmir.

                              It's a cowardly act by Hindustan to target a defenceless Bangladesh.
                              1971

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X