Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pakistans naval punch

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Pakistans naval punch

    From one port it has now expanded to four naval ports. Please not the authors point how Pak can cut off oil supplies to India at will. After seeing the stratagic location of Gawadar at the mouth of Arabian Gulf I should get the credit of making that point.

    Two scenarios of post-Kargil security environment of South Asia need to be noted today.

    The first reported by Jane's Fighting Ships 2000-2001 (page-82): `The largest single annual increase in India's defence budget follows last year's border war with Pakistan in the Kargil region of Kashmir. Some commentators have credited the Navy's strategic manoeuvres in the Arabian Sea of the Pakistan coast in mid-1999 as hastening the end of that burst of fighting, and as a result some of the budget increase has been directed at the Navy.'

    Second is the Defence Minister, Mr George Fernandes's statement in the Indian Parliament in August 2000 that India is watching the increasing activity of the Pakistani Navy in the Arabian Sea. Both the points need probing on the basis of hard facts and figures requiring no proof.

    Since there was no Pakistan before 1947, the history and geography of Pakistan navy were also Indian. It inherited India s lack of combat maritime tradition. This tradition continued owing to the land-based wars with India and the successive coups by the generals of the
    Pakistani Army. A theocratic Islamic state administered by an army created by English rulers and armed by the United States, the navy in Pakistan (like in India) was always the step-child till Saturday, December 4, 1971, when Karachi got a brutal blow from the Indian navy s missile boats and the Indian Air Force s air-to-surface missiles. The need for a navy to counter the threat to Pakistan s only port and naval base Karachi was born.

    However, the problem with any naval plan is its gestation period which is long and complicated. Warships take years to build.

    Pakistan s strategic (lack of) depth, even in a conventional security environment, makes the shape and size of its fleet follow the
    fleet-in-being tactics, thereby implying strong deterrent against a superior navy s quantity of ships. It also made its naval logistics look west to have several dispersed naval bases to reduce strategic dependence on Karachi s geographical vulnerability owing to its Indian proximity.

    The outcome, therefore, is for all to see. From one naval base,
    Karachi, and 13,000-man navy in 1987-1988 (Military Balance figure), Pakistan now has 2,51,000 personnel (2,300 officers) including 1,200 marines and 1,000 seconded to Maritime Security Agency (set up in 1986) and 5,000 reserves and four ports/naval bases of Karachi, Gwadar (naval base), Port Qasim and Port Ormara ; the latter opened on
    Wednesday, May 7, 1997, as a major naval base and repair facility to reduce the burden on Karachi. Ormara in future will be the base of half of the Pakistani navy s major units and all the submarines. Situated 300 km west of Karachi on the Makran coast, Port Ormara is a desolate place with a coastal road connecting Karachi in the east and Gwadar (which is another 290 km) to the west down the sea shore. This remote location tactically makes the Pakistani Navy comparatively less vulnerable to first strike attack, thereby giving it more punch to its fleet for classical maritime counter-stroke called fleet-in-being.

    The current acquisition and deployment of the Pakistani ships too give a clear idea about the traditional Pakistani love for submarines which could be used for frequent sea denial and occasional (sectoral) sea control role vis-a-vis India. Thus, the shifting of submarine base west of Karachi, on the Makran coast, to Ormara Port will give the Pakistani Navy a vital edge to disrupt the sea lanes of India s oil import from the Persian Gulf, should a crisis take place in the
    future. That is not all. There now will be three layers of screening areas at the disposal of the Pakistani Navy for the Indian crude s voyage from Muscat to Mumbai or Dubai to Cochi Gwadar, Port Qasim and Port Ormara.

    At present, though one may pooh-pooh any suggestion of Pakistan s naval threat to India as a fantasy, it needs an understanding and analysis of the nuances of Pakistan s naval deployment and the
    assigned task in a particular environment. Undoubtedly there cannot be any comparison between the Indian and the Pakistani Navy, the former having an edge both in terms of number and variety of ships. The point here is not of one-to-one matching of strength and punching ability. The design here is the art and craft of a smaller navy s maritime strategy to take on a superior navy with a modern submarine fleet acquired from France. It is the Agosta 90B class SSK (Pakistani name Khalid) submarines which neatly fits into the disruptive role of the Indian crude s sea lanes, with or without crisis.

    Thus, built by DCN Cherbourg, France, the 1,510 tons (surfaced), 1760 dived Agosta 90B s greatest asset is its diving depth of 320 metres (1,050 feet) which outdives all Indian submarines (HDW 209-type
    1,500-260 metres = 853 feet; and Kilotype 87 EM/636 class-300 metres = 985 feet). Other parameters being
    conventional, what makes the French-built Pakistani submarine ominous for India s strategic raw material crude oil is its plan to have a 200kw MESMA liquid oxygen air independent propulsion system...which would quadruple the dived performance of the submarine at 4 knot.

    Clearly, therefore, the role and deployment of the Pakistani navy is military-cum-economic.

    Pakistani defence planners have made clever ploy by going beyond the military hardware into the economics of warfare. Thus, apart from the the counterfeit Indian currency is doing roaring business in the Indian market, thereby damaging the
    macro-economics of India. On top of it all comes the most vulnerable of Indian macro-economic insecurity, the crude oil lifeline which passes through the zone of Pakistani naval activity, wherein the one port of Karachi now has become four-port (Karachi, Gwadar, Port Qasim and Port Ormar) maritime force.

    Naval activity notwithstanding, diplomacy too is an indicator towards Pakistan s new push towards West Asia to counter its enemy in the east. Thus, in line with its understanding of the strategic
    petro-economics of Gulf, required for any burgeoning economy like India s, Pakistan has recently opened two posts of Defence Attache at Muscat (Oman) headed by a naval captain and naval attache in Teheran (Iran). Interestingly, Iran and Oman are the flanking doorways to the Persian Gulf through which sails the largest number of oil tankers per day.

    The other newly opened Pakistani naval attaches posts are Beijing and Kuala Lumpur. China fits in well with Pakistani navy s strategy. But how come Malaysia? Is it because of the strategic importance of Strait of Malacca and the operations around Andaman and Nicobar Islands of the Indian Navy! Whatever be the logic or vision, the understanding of the role of navy in the economics and security of a nation is now being understood well by Pakistan. Pakistan is a shade ahead of the Indian understanding, notwithstanding its smaller number of ships.

    (The author is an alumnus of the National Defence college of India)

    #2
    More on Pak navy http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/ok.gif

    frontierpost.com.pk
    Pakistan ahead of India in N. technology
    By Shahid Mahmood
    After the US Intelligence report putting Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal
    way ahead than India, the latest Indian Naval Intelligence report has
    sent further shock waves down the spine of political and military
    establishment in New Delhi who were made to believe over the years
    that India could mincemeat of Pakistan anywhere, anytime.
    The latest Naval Intelligence reports received here at very high-level
    defence circles indicate that Pakistan’s Navy could well be superior
    to that of India. According to the latest information gathered by the
    Indian intelligence agencies, the balance seems to have shifted in
    Pakistan’s favours after it built a modern naval base “Jinnah Port” at
    an island near Karachi. This naval station, according to Indian
    Intelligence report, is equipped with the latest world class modern
    gadgets and has a fleet of submarines.
    Sources in defence circles said all the major cities of western India
    are now in the range of any possible attack by the Pakistani Navy. The
    naval station, while rendering India’s defence vulnerable, has put up
    a strong defence barrier and strengthened Pakistan’s capacity
    “immensely” to defend the crucial and strategically placed port of
    Karachi.
    A top Indian defence official said here while Indian public was fed on
    the rhetoric of traditional superiority of Indian forces over
    Pakistan’s, the fact is that Pakistan can nuclear-cap its missiles
    better than India. If that was not enough, Pakistan has now edged out
    India on the naval front too.
    India, he said, as of now, has 12 submarines out of which four are
    virtually non-functional and the five Russian submarines haven’t
    proved to be very effective in Arabian Sea due to the warm currents.
    Pakistan, on the other hand, has 20 fully operational submarines.
    When India has to guard almost 7000 km of sea front at present.
    “Pakistan by hook or crook has stolen a march over India in missiles,
    nuclear capabilities and now on naval front,” admitted an Indian
    defence official.
    Earlier India was made to believe that Pakistan does not have enough
    plutonium to build many warheads. But, the latest intelligence reports
    suggest that the Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology at Nilore
    is extracting plutonium for mini-warheads from the spent fuel of the
    recently-commissioned Army-controlled plant at Joharabad in Khushab
    district of Punjab. The report believed that Pakistan is making at
    least one warhead and fitting them on their “proven” missiles.
    Analysing the preparedness of India’s nuclear force, Wing Commander N.
    K.Pant says there is a huge gap between India and Pakistan in terms of
    credible missile deterrence force. He observed that Prithvi system was
    quite cumbersome due to its liquid fuel propulsion. Though both India
    and Pakistan are battling for a “nuclear inferiority” status with each
    one trying to say it has fewer bombs than others. The US Intelligence
    reports are, however, adamant that contrary to earlier belief
    Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal could be five times as large as India. The
    reports estimate that Pakistan could have built 25 to 100 bombs, a
    massive increase from the earlier estimates of 10 to 15. They put
    India’s nuclear arsenal at just five, which are not even ready to be
    mounted on missiles. Earlier the reports had credited India with 20 to
    40 bombs.

    Comment


      #3

      The strategic implications of this are music to my and your ears and all patriotic boys.

      It proves that the National Defence College and other various inter-service organisations are makin possible for the type of co-operation so necessary for modern defence forces.

      Keep kickin 'em bro, I'll back u up http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/hula.gif

      PAKISTAN BAINDABAD http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/soldier.gif

      Comment


        #4

        The strategic implications of this are music to my and your ears and all patriotic boys.

        It proves that the National Defence College and other various inter-service organisations are makin possible for the type of co-operation so necessary for modern defence forces.

        Keep kickin 'em bro, I'll back u up http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/hula.gif

        PAKISTAN BAINDABAD http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/soldier.gif

        Comment


          #5
          Cool info thanks alot, but yaar link is a must!!!

          ------------------
          Our's not to reason why,
          Our's but to do and die:
          You can't fix stupid. So might as well troll them!

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by CM:
            Cool info thanks alot, but yaar link is a must!!!

            http://janes.com/ (JDW) Janes defence weekly and Janes fighting ships. Any one with membership can retreive that article.

            Comment

            Working...
            X