Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Intimacy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Kashmiri girl

    Physical intimacy or closeness, without emotions, implies a thoughtless, emotionless and "cheap" act on part of human being that treats human 'meat' as a commodity of lowest value.

    Whether it is right or wrong to have a physical relationship is not something I am qualified to comment upon. However, I believe physical rerlationship without emotions is degrading and beyond basic principles of humanity. Anyone having a physical relationship without having emotions leaves one exposed to being labelled, something far less than an animal. As one belives, animals also function and operate within some defined parameters.

    What do I prefer? Well, I leave your imaginatiosn to work that out.

    [This message has been edited by kashjh (edited April 26, 1999).]

    [This message has been edited by kashjh (edited April 26, 1999).]

    Comment


      #17
      kashjh,
      Aab aissa bhee burra nahein haay..

      Comment


        #18
        kashjh

        ....However, I believe physical rerlationship without emotions is degrading and beyond basic principles of humanity....

        excellent point. I agree...emotional intimacy is the preferred and much strong bond. However....physical closeness does not always lead to emotional...for everyone.

        Oh and thanks for the email and welcome to gupshup.

        Comment

        Working...
        X