What do you think is the reason for Westerners are more free, agressive and independent than most of us. We can not do small household things. We do not have habit of working with hands. Very few of us would be able to repair their vehicle while americans often fix their car themselves. You can see a single American wandering atound in Asia. They can live very independently.
Theuy can also think very independently. That is precisely why they have done far better in sciences. We at best reproduce a technology in 40's like nuclear bomb and take pride in that. Very few innovative thinkers in science have come from our part of the world.
We claim to be religious and talk about philosophical matters. However, there is hardly a philosopher worth noting.
I am not saying there are no smart people among us. But if you look at new innovations, very miniscule can be claiomed by us.
Do you think that the teachers and parents together somehow kill an urge of innovation in the child by forcing him to do many things and not letting him ask any inconvenient question.
If you say poverty, not just south Asia, very few Japanese can claim to have paved way in sciences (though at times in technology). Is it because they share a similar dominating parents family structure.
What do you think?
Theuy can also think very independently. That is precisely why they have done far better in sciences. We at best reproduce a technology in 40's like nuclear bomb and take pride in that. Very few innovative thinkers in science have come from our part of the world.
We claim to be religious and talk about philosophical matters. However, there is hardly a philosopher worth noting.
I am not saying there are no smart people among us. But if you look at new innovations, very miniscule can be claiomed by us.
Do you think that the teachers and parents together somehow kill an urge of innovation in the child by forcing him to do many things and not letting him ask any inconvenient question.
If you say poverty, not just south Asia, very few Japanese can claim to have paved way in sciences (though at times in technology). Is it because they share a similar dominating parents family structure.
What do you think?
Comment