I was debating whether this belongs in General, World Affairs, or Culture, and decided for culture in the end.
A recent ban on a television advertisement for a skin-lightening cream has fuelled a debate in India over why fairer skin should be considered more beautiful.
While India has seen a phenomenal growth in the number of skin-lightening products, women's groups in the country claim recent adverts are insulting, as they equate fairer skin with beauty and success.
One advert - for a product named Fair And Lovely - has now been taken off the air.
"It's a highly racist campaign," Brinda Karat, general secretary of the All India Democratic Women's Association, told BBC World Service's Everywoman programme.
"It equates fairness with beauty."
The advert was known as "the air hostess ad".
It showed a young, dark-skinned girl's father lamenting he had no son to provide for him, as his daughter's salary was not high enough - the suggestion being that she could neither get a better job or get married because of her dark skin.
A recent ban on a television advertisement for a skin-lightening cream has fuelled a debate in India over why fairer skin should be considered more beautiful.
While India has seen a phenomenal growth in the number of skin-lightening products, women's groups in the country claim recent adverts are insulting, as they equate fairer skin with beauty and success.
One advert - for a product named Fair And Lovely - has now been taken off the air.
"It's a highly racist campaign," Brinda Karat, general secretary of the All India Democratic Women's Association, told BBC World Service's Everywoman programme.
"It equates fairness with beauty."
The advert was known as "the air hostess ad".
It showed a young, dark-skinned girl's father lamenting he had no son to provide for him, as his daughter's salary was not high enough - the suggestion being that she could neither get a better job or get married because of her dark skin.
Comment